I’m 37, and if you lined up my closest friends—the ones I actually call, the ones who know the ongoing story of my life—you wouldn’t see a string of thirty-somethings in a similar chapter to mine. You’d see a 65-year-old who rebuilt her career from scratch after a divorce, a 68-year-old who has been telling me the truth about my decisions for six years, a 62-year-old whose company I seek out specifically when I need someone who isn’t going to panic alongside me. This wasn’t a plan. I didn’t set out to build a social life with people from a different generation, and I couldn’t have told you ten years ago that this is where I’d land. But it’s been true long enough now that I’ve started to pay attention to it—and the more I think about what these friendships actually give me, the more sense it makes. Psychology has some explanations for it. So does just knowing myself a little better than I used to.
There’s no competition between us
The friendships I have with people my own age are good. But there’s a texture to them I’ve only recently started to notice—a subtle monitoring of each other’s lives. Not maliciously, but persistently. Who got promoted, who bought a house, who has kids now, who is thriving, who is quietly falling behind. Psychologists call this social comparison—the instinct to measure our own progress against people in similar circumstances—and it’s particularly strong among people in the same life stage. We’re on roughly the same road, and we can see each other’s position relative to our own, whether we want to or not. Even the most supportive same-age friendships carry this as background noise.
With my friends in their 60s, it’s gone. There’s no road we’re both on. There’s no comparison to be made because our lives aren’t commensurable in that way. When they ask about my life, it’s from pure curiosity, untethered from any orientation toward where I stand relative to them or them relative to me. The question “how’s work going?” doesn’t carry any weight other than genuine interest in the answer.
I didn’t understand how much that background noise was costing me until it was absent. I didn’t realize how much energy I spent managing it—performing slightly, adjusting what I said, being aware of the optics even when I didn’t want to be. With my older friends, none of that is necessary. I can say I’m struggling without it being a data point in a comparison. I can say things are going well without creating a dynamic. The conversation can just be what it is, without any of us calculating where we land.
They’ve already survived the things I’m afraid of
My closest older friend went through a divorce at 47, a career reinvention in her 50s, and the death of her mother while raising teenage children. I’m 37, and I’m afraid of those things. Not all of them are guaranteed, but some version of them—loss, transition, the particular grief of watching something you built fall apart—is probably coming. I know this the way you know things abstractly, which is to say without really knowing it at all.
What she gives me, without meaning to and without me having to ask, is evidence. She’s standing in front of me, intact, occasionally laughing, having a glass of wine, and telling me what she’s currently reading. She got through it. The divorce didn’t end her. The career change didn’t ruin her. The grief didn’t hollow her out permanently. I don’t need her to tell me it gets better—I can see that it does, in the specific form of her, sitting across from me.
People my own age can offer sympathy when hard things happen. My older friends offer something different: a track record. They’ve been in rooms I haven’t been in yet, and they came out. That knowledge sits underneath everything else we talk about. It’s not that our conversations are about their past resilience—they mostly aren’t. It’s that their presence is itself a kind of argument for making it through. An argument I didn’t know I needed until I had access to it. When I’m spiraling about whether I’ll be okay, I don’t need reassurance. I need a demonstration. They are the demonstration.
More Bolde Stories
They tell me what they actually think
I’ve noticed that people in their 30s—and I include myself in this—are often very careful with each other. We validate. We support. We respond to difficult situations with “I’m sure you know what’s best” or “whatever you need.” This isn’t dishonesty exactly. It’s a social code that prizes people feeling comfortable over people being told hard truths. We’ve absorbed it so thoroughly that we often don’t notice we’re doing it.
My older friends did not get to their 60s by being socially cautious. When I described a professional decision I was considering to one of them, she said, flat out, “That sounds like a bad idea and here’s why.” No softening, no “have you thought about,” no framing designed to make the observation land without bruising. And then she was completely open to hearing my side, and she changed her mind when I made a good point, and we had the best conversation I’d had in months.
I don’t think this is because older people are blunt by nature. I think it’s because they’ve largely stopped needing you to think well of them. The social anxiety of being liked—of monitoring how you’re landing—diminishes with the accumulation of years and relationships that survived honesty. My older friends say what they think because they’re not performing for me. Once I got used to it, I couldn’t go back to the alternative. I hadn’t realized until then that I’d been having a slightly managed version of most conversations—and that I’d accepted that as the normal cost of friendship.
They don’t share my sense of urgency, and that’s a good thing
I live in the particular anxiety of my 30s—the sense that everything is happening now, that windows are either open or closing, that decisions made at this point are structurally important in a way later ones won’t be. Career, relationship, money, body, the shape of the life I’m building—all of it feels pressing in a way I can’t fully defend rationally but can’t seem to shake. My peers largely feel this too, which means we often amplify each other’s urgency rather than offering perspective on it.
My older friends don’t feel this way. Not because things stopped mattering to them, but because they’ve watched enough of the things they were certain were urgent turn out not to be, and enough of the things that genuinely mattered sneak up sideways. There’s a psychological concept called socioemotional selectivity theory that describes how, as people age, they shift from prioritizing new experiences and achievement toward prioritizing emotional meaning—they’ve already done the striving, and now they know what it was actually worth. They’ve been through the decade I’m in, and they know what it looks like from the other side. What they bring to any conversation I’m spinning out about is a patient clarity that isn’t dismissive—they’re not telling me it doesn’t matter—but that comes from a completely different relationship with time.
One of them said to me once, about something I was treating as a crisis: “you’ll look back on this as the year before everything changed, not the year of this particular thing.” She was right. I couldn’t see it then. The fact that she could—not as a prediction but as a lived understanding of how things tend to look in retrospect—changed the whole conversation. I can’t manufacture that perspective in myself yet. But I can borrow it, temporarily, from someone who has earned it.
What this says about me
I’ve thought about what it means that I keep gravitating toward people two decades older than me. I know there are explanations—something about lower social stakes, something about seeking guidance, something about what I grew up with and what I’m still looking for. I’ve read enough to know I’m not the first thirty-something to prefer the company of people who’ve already lived through their thirties.
But what feels truest when I actually sit with it is this: I’m drawn to people who are past the part I find hardest about my own generation right now. We are collectively exhausted by performance. By the optimization of our lives and the presentation of those lives. By the sense that everything we do is legible to an audience and needs to be calibrated accordingly. My older friends are largely free of this—not because they’re better people, but because they’ve outlasted the particular social anxiety of early adulthood, and it simply lost its grip on them over time.
I don’t want to idealize them. They have their own anxieties, their own unresolved things, their own ways of being difficult. The friendships work the way all good friendships work—through honesty, time, and showing up. But what I find in these specific people is something I keep reaching for and not quite finding in the same concentration elsewhere: the feeling of being in a room with someone who is fully, genuinely themselves, without a performance running underneath. That’s rare at any age. I’ve just had better luck finding it in people who’ve had longer to get there. And maybe that’s its own kind of information about where I’m headed—that the thing I’m most drawn to in them is something I’m still trying to become.
Editor’s Note: This piece is part of our “As Told to Bolde” series where we share personal stories from individuals we have interviewed or surveyed. For more information on how we create content, please review our Editorial Policy.
