Talk to most people about what they expect to regret and you get a story about something that blew up. The business that folded. The move that didn’t take. The relationship they should have seen coming.
It’s a reasonable forecast. Failure is vivid, it has a date attached, and you can point at the wreckage.
It’s also not what comes back when researchers ask people who have already done most of their living.
When you put the question to people in their seventies and eighties, the answers skew hard in the other direction, toward the things that were never attempted at all.
When researchers asked people to name the biggest regrets of their lives, most of what came back was things that never happened
In the early 1990s, researchers at Cornell went looking for a wide spread of people rather than the usual undergraduate pool.
They interviewed 40 students, 16 clerical and custodial staff, 10 retired professors, and 11 residents of nursing homes in upstate New York. Everyone got the same open question: when you look back on your life, what do you regret?
Nobody was told what the study was about. The sorting into action versus inaction came afterward, done by judges who didn’t know what the researchers were hoping to find, working from 213 written and transcribed regrets.
Across the two youngest groups, 61 percent of the regrets were about things not done.
Across the two oldest, the retired professors and the nursing home residents, it was 74 percent.
The pattern held across the whole sample and became the foundation of a much-cited 1994 paper showing that people’s biggest regrets involve what they failed to do.
One honest footnote: the two oldest groups were 21 people combined, and the age difference itself wasn’t statistically significant. Suggestive, not settled.
What stings this week is usually something you did, and what stings in forty years is usually something you didn’t
The finding was strange when it landed, because a whole body of laboratory research said the opposite. Give people a scenario about a man who sold a stock and lost money versus a man who considered selling and didn’t, and almost everyone predicts the seller feels worse.
Both things turn out to be true. They just live on different clocks.
In a follow-up, the same team approached 32 people at bus stops and laundromats and asked each of them two questions. Think of your biggest regret of the past week. Now think of the biggest regret of your whole life. Which one bothers you more?
For the past week, it split nearly evenly, 53 percent naming an action and 47 percent naming an inaction.
For the whole life, 84 percent named the inaction.
Same people. Same afternoon. The answer flipped depending on how far back they were asked to look.
The regret you feel about last Wednesday tells you very little about the regret you’ll feel about this decade. They are made of different material.
More Bolde Stories
A study that followed a thousand gifted kids for six decades heard the same answer in their seventies
The bus stop sample was small. There is one dataset that isn’t.
Starting in the 1920s, a famous Stanford project recruited more than a thousand high-scoring California schoolchildren and followed them for the rest of their lives. In 1986, 381 men and 339 women from that group, by then averaging 74 years old, were asked what they would do differently if they could live it over.
Researchers later pulled the archived answers and had eight judges, blind to the hypothesis, sort them.
The participants, like everyone else, reported far more regrets of inaction than of action.
This group was not a random slice of America. They were selected for IQ, they were overwhelmingly white and Californian, and they were born into a specific century. But they were asked the question late, they were asked it in bulk, and the answers went the same direction as everything else.
Actions get repaired and inactions just sit there, which is most of why one fades and the other doesn’t
The mechanism behind all this is less mysterious than the finding.
When you do something and it goes badly, you take steps. You leave the marriage. You quit the job. You apologize, you pay it off, you move again. And when there’s nothing to be done, you do the other kind of work: you explain it to yourself until it makes a kind of sense, you find the lesson, you notice what it led to.
Neither of those happens to something you never started.
There’s no wreckage to clean up and no story to tell, because nothing occurred. It just sits there, unresolved, available.
Two more things make it worse over time. People tend to romanticize the road they didn’t take, filling it in with everything that would have gone right. And the fears that stopped them in the first place, the money, the timing, the fear of looking foolish, stop seeming like adequate reasons once the moment is decades gone.
One complication here. Daniel Kahneman pushed back on the Cornell team in the 1990s, arguing that long-term inaction regrets are mostly wistful rather than agonizing. They ran studies together and published a partial resolution in 1998: action regrets skew toward hot emotions like anger, while inaction regrets carry both nostalgia and genuine despair.
So some of these are a quiet what-if, and some of them are a wound. The research does not say which one you’ll get.
The regrets that last are about the person you meant to become, not the rules you were supposed to follow
Twenty years later, the same lab came back to the question with a different frame.
Instead of sorting regrets by action and inaction, the researchers sorted them by which version of the self had been let down. The ought self is the person you were supposed to be: dutiful, responsible, keeping your obligations. The ideal self is the person you hoped to become.
Across six studies published in 2018, participants reported ideal-self regrets over ought-self regrets by 72 percent to 28 percent. Asked to name the single biggest regret of their life, 76 percent named something about their ideal self.
The lead researcher told Cornell’s news office that “the failure to be your ideal self is usually an inaction,” and the example he gave was ordinary to the point of being uncomfortable: frittering time away and never getting around to learning an instrument.
The explanation for the durability is practical. Ought-self failures are concrete. You missed the funeral, you didn’t call your mother back, and you know exactly what fixing it would look like, so you fix it and file it away.
Ideal-self failures are vague enough that there’s never an obvious first step. Which means there’s never a moment where they’re done.
More Bolde Stories
Psychology says people who duck down an aisle to avoid someone they know at the grocery store are...
Psychology says people who feel liberated living alone instead of lonely usually have these 9 tra...
Parents can usually tell their adult child is struggling before any phone call comes, and 7 small...
The deathbed version of this finding is the thinnest evidence in the pile and the part everyone quotes
You have almost certainly encountered the list. An Australian palliative care nurse named Bronnie Ware posted it on her blog in 2009 and expanded it into a book, and it has been circulating ever since.
Ware wrote that she spent years with patients in the last three to twelve weeks of their lives, and that when she asked about regrets, the same five themes surfaced again and again. The most common was wishing for the courage to have lived a life true to themselves rather than the life others expected.
Second was working too hard. Third was never expressing how they felt.
All of these are inactions, and all of them line up with the peer-reviewed work almost too neatly. That neatness is a reason for care.
What she wrote down is a nurse’s memory of her own patients. There are no counts, no comparison group, no way to know how many people she’s describing or how the question was put. It’s testimony, and it should be read as testimony.
The formal research on what dying people regret about their lives is remarkably thin. What exists is 11 nursing home residents from 1994 and a set of themes that show up whenever people over 70 are asked what they’d change.
The strong evidence is about long time horizons. The very end of the horizon is mostly inference.
A replication with 2,600 people found the pattern held in the short term and flattened in the long term
The temporal flip has been tested repeatedly, and the results are messier than the popular version suggests.
In 2022, an independent team ran preregistered replications of four of the original study designs with 988 American participants online. Three of the four held up, though with weaker effects than the originals. The fourth, the bus stop study with the 84 percent figure, did not.
Then the original lab went back at it with a much larger sample.
Mindworks, a psychology museum in Chicago, runs an exhibit where visitors write down their biggest regret of the last few days or of their life so far, then hang the card on one of two pegs. Over the first year, 2,600 people played along.
The short-term result was clean: 58 percent said the action bothered them more.
The long-term result was not. Fifty-one percent named an action and 49 percent named an inaction, a split not significantly different from chance.
The researchers called it a partial replication. Action regrets really do loom larger up close than at a distance; that part survived. The dramatic long-term skew did not.
Their best guess for the gap is age. Mindworks is a family museum, and a nine-year-old’s “life to this point” is not the same instrument as a seventy-four-year-old’s. The processes that grind down action regrets and inflate inaction regrets need decades to run, and the museum crowd hadn’t given them decades.
That’s a plausible explanation and also an untestable one, since the museum collected no demographics. Take it as the researchers offered it.
Regret collects wherever you still believe a door is open
There’s one more result that reframes all of this, and it comes from a different lab entirely.
Researchers pooled 11 studies that had ranked people’s biggest life regrets and found a consistent top six: education, career, romance, parenting, the self, and leisure, in that order.
Damage didn’t predict that ranking. What lined up with it was how much opportunity people still perceived in each domain. Education came first because education feels like something you could still do something about.
Which gives regret a forward-facing edge. It clusters around the places where you haven’t yet closed the file.
So the practical takeaway stops well short of the poster slogan about taking every risk. Plenty of risks are bad, and the people in these studies who regretted their actions were not making that up.
The useful version is narrower. When you’re weighing something and the fear in the room is the fear of looking foolish, notice that this particular fear has a short shelf life. It is enormous now and it will not be enormous in fifteen years, and it will have stopped being a reason long before you stop thinking about what it cost you.
The thing that went wrong gets a story eventually. You’ll tell it at dinner.
The thing that never started doesn’t get one, and that’s the whole difference.
And if a particular regret has stopped being a thought you have occasionally and become one you can’t put down, that’s a different kind of problem, and a therapist is a reasonable person to bring it to.
