Most Boomers set out to be warmer parents than their own parents had been. That was more or less the plan from the start.
Their own mothers and fathers had come up in the Depression and raised families through a war, and they ran their households like people who’d learned not to count on much. Affection wasn’t a big part of it. You got fed and clothed, you got told to toughen up, and you figured out the rest yourself.
So this generation decided to do it differently, on purpose. They said “I love you” and made sure their kids heard it. They showed up to the games and the recitals. They asked how their kids were feeling and waited for the answer. More than anything, they wanted their kids to grow up without ever doubting they were loved or wondering whether they were safe.
It worked. But now, in their seventies, a lot of them are looking at their grown kids and feeling something they didn’t see coming — a small, uncomfortable suspicion that they might have protected them a little too well.
They were determined not to raise their kids the way they’d been raised
Ask a Boomer about their own childhood, and you’ll usually get some version of the same answer: it was fine, but nobody talked about anything. Feelings didn’t come up.
A scraped knee got a “you’re okay, get up.” A bad report card got a long look and a tense dinner. A lot of them can still tell you about the one time their father said he was proud of them, because it only happened once.
They don’t usually hold it against their parents. They understand it as a product of harder times — you don’t make a fuss over a skinned knee when you’re not sure there’s enough money for the week. But they felt what was missing, and they swore their own kids would never feel it. Their kids were going to grow up sure they were loved, no question about it.
And they had a point.
A child shouldn’t have to earn affection. “Walk it off” is a lousy thing to say to a kid who’s scared and hurting. Wanting to be warmer than your own parents were is a good instinct, and nobody should pretend it wasn’t.
Somewhere along the way, every problem became theirs to fix
Being loving was easy. What snuck up on them was everything else they slowly started treating as their job.
It made sense one decision at a time.
A kid having trouble with a teacher? Call the school.
A fight with a friend? Step in and smooth it over.
A bad grade? Maybe the assignment wasn’t fair, and maybe a word to the teacher is in order.
A forgotten lunch got dropped off at the front office. A blown deadline got an email asking for an extension. None of it felt like too much. It felt like being a good parent, which is exactly why it was so hard to catch. What kind of parent watches their kid fail at something they could fix in five minutes?
But it added up. String enough little rescues together over eighteen years and you end up with a kid who never really had to sit inside a problem and find their own way out. Not because anyone planned it that way. Because every single time, jumping in was the loving thing to do.
It’s tricky to see. They set out to be the parent who never left their kid hanging, and they got so good at it that the kid never found out what they could handle alone.
More Bolde Stories
Some lessons only land when a kid has to struggle through them
What they couldn’t see at the time is pretty simple:
A certain amount of struggling is how kids learn things. Not all of it is bad. Some of it is good.
A kid who’s never bored doesn’t learn how to entertain themselves. A kid whose every fight gets settled by an adult doesn’t learn how to settle one on their own. And a kid who never gets to fail at something small — a class, a tryout, a friendship that fizzles out — never learns the single most useful thing there is to know: that failing feels awful for a while, and then it stops, and you’re still here.
There’s research that backs this up. One large study found that people who’d been through some hardship in their lives ended up more resilient than people who’d been through a lot — and also more resilient than people who’d been through almost none.
A little difficulty, survived, seems to get you ready for the next round. Too much wears you down. None at all leaves you oddly unprepared for anything.
So the parents who smoothed away every bump weren’t doing something wrong, exactly. They were loving their kids the most hands-on way they knew how. They just also moved them past the small, survivable failures that are how a person works up to handling the big ones.
‘Fragile’ isn’t quite the right word for it
‘Fragile” is a harsh word to pin on a whole generation, and it isn’t quite fair.
For one thing, the world their kids grew up in wasn’t the one they’d been promised:
Work hard, buy a house, expect things to hold steady — that deal mostly came apart.
Their kids did everything they were told to do, got the degree and the job, and still couldn’t afford a place and watched the rent climb every year, all while carrying a phone that never stopped showing them everyone else apparently doing better. A lot of what gets called fragile is just a fair reaction to a much harder set of circumstances.
For another, every older generation has said this about the younger one.
Researchers who studied the “kids these days” feeling found it’s basically a human constant — people have been sure the youth were going soft for at least two thousand years. It comes down to a quirk of memory: we remember ourselves as tougher than we were, then measure today’s kids against that. Some of what these parents read as softness is the same thing their own parents once thought about them.
And some of it isn’t softness at all. A kid who can say how they feel, set a boundary, and refuse to “tough out” something that’s hurting them isn’t weaker than a generation that bottled it all up and called that strength. Half the time, they’re doing exactly what their parents hoped they would — just out loud.
They didn’t love their kids too much — they just rescued them too fast
So the regret, for the ones who feel it, isn’t about love. They don’t wish they’d loved their kids less, and they definitely don’t wish they’d turned into their own parents.
What they’d change is the rescuing — the reflex to jump in the second their kid hit a wall and make the call, fix the thing, clear the path ahead. Not to toughen the kids up, nothing cold like that. Just to have let them find out sooner how much they could carry on their own.
Because when you catch someone every single time they stumble, they never get the chance to learn that they can get back up. You mean it as protection. But year after year, the kid picks up the message hiding underneath it: you can’t handle this on your own, let me.
It’s a hard thing to realize at seventy-something, with the kids grown and the patterns long set. But plenty of them are realizing it anyway. You can see it at a birthday party — a grandparent watching a grandkid fall apart over a lost board game, then leaning over to tell their own grown child: Let her lose this one, she’s fine.
It won’t feel like love in the moment, which is exactly what makes it so hard to do.
More Bolde Stories
A study that followed workers from six months before retirement to a full year after found the pe...
People raised in the 60s and 70s were told no so often that they accidentally developed 8 traits ...
