Every generation is sure it cracked parenting, and every generation’s kids grew up and filed corrections.
The boomer who kept four children fed through two recessions, the Gen X dad who was front and center for every single game, the millennial mom narrating feelings through a tantrum in a Target aisle. All of them are running the same job title on completely different job descriptions.
One thinks the job is providing. One thinks it’s being present. One thinks it’s being emotionally attuned. The youngest thinks it’s preparation, and has some pointed opinions about the three approaches that came before.
The split shows up cleanly in the data.
When Pew Research Center asked more than 3,700 parents how their approach compares to their own upbringing, the country divided almost exactly in half, with 43 percent raising their kids the way they were raised and 44 percent deliberately doing the opposite.
And among the parents doing the opposite, the most common theme wasn’t discipline or money or screens. It was love, wanting their children to feel more of it than they did.
Reflect on that for a second. Nearly half of American parents looked at how they were raised, by people who were certain they were doing it right, and decided the core of it needed to be redone.
Nobody in that chain thought they were the problem. Every generation grades itself against its own definition, and the definitions barely overlap.
Boomers measured good parenting in what got provided, and 8 in 10 of their generation approved of spanking
For boomer parents, the job was material and moral. Keep them fed, housed, churched if you went in for that, and pointed at a stable adulthood. A good parent was a good provider, and the proof was the outcome: did the kid turn out okay, get a job, stay out of trouble.
Warmth existed, plenty of it, but it wasn’t the metric. It arrived sideways, through a full plate and a paid-for education, and you were expected to read it fluently. Saying it out loud was for greeting cards.
Authority wasn’t optional either. Children were junior members of a household run by adults, and discipline was considered part of the love, not in tension with it.
The numbers from their era back this up.
When the General Social Survey first asked Americans in 1986 whether a child sometimes needs “a good, hard spanking,” 83.5 percent agreed, a figure that had fallen to 52.1 percent by 2021. What was near-consensus when boomers were raising kids is now a coin flip, and among younger parents it keeps dropping.
But what gets lost in the discourse is, by their own definition, most boomer parents succeeded. They provided through recessions, gas lines, and layoffs. The mortgage got paid and the kids got launched.
Which is why the modern critique lands so strangely on them. Their adult children describe childhoods that were materially fine and emotionally thin, and the boomer parent hears an accounting error. All those years of providing, entered in a column nobody’s counting anymore.
Gen X decided a good parent is one who shows up, because theirs mostly didn’t
Gen X built its definition as a correction. They were the latchkey kids, home alone at eight with a key on a shoestring, raised during the collision of surging divorce rates and both parents working. Nobody watched their games. Nobody asked about their day. They handled it, and they’re weirdly proud of that, and they also swore their own kids would never experience it.
So the Gen X definition of a good parent is almost embarrassingly simple. You are there. At the recital, at the pickup line, at the orthodontist. Presence is the scoreboard, because absence was the wound.
The result was one of the sharpest overcorrections in modern family life, from the least supervised childhood in memory to travel teams, tracking apps, and knowing your kid’s login credentials. The free-range kids became some of the most vigilant parents on record, and they mostly don’t see the irony, or they see it and don’t care.
Pew’s data suggests how thoroughly the vigilance won. In its 2023 parenting survey, 45 percent of parents said they tend to be overprotective, against just 20 percent who said they give too much freedom.
The catch is that the wound may have been smaller than the correction. When researchers actually studied latchkey kids in the early 90s, science journalist Bruce Bower reported they did about as well socially and emotionally as supervised kids, with outcomes tracking the overall home more than the empty afternoons.
Gen X doesn’t want to hear that. The empty house is their origin story, and the definition it produced is non-negotiable. A good parent is in the stands. Everything else is commentary.
More Bolde Stories
Millennials made feelings the metric, and the first study of gentle parents found them calm, devoted, and overwhelmed
Millennials are the first generation to define good parenting primarily as an emotional skill. Not providing, not attendance. Attunement. A good parent stays regulated, validates the feeling, names the feeling, and never becomes the thing their kid needs therapy for.
This is the generation that made gentle parenting a household phrase and turned tantrums into teachable moments about big emotions. The shift is sincere and it is enormous. A boomer parent asked what the child did. A millennial parent asks what the child felt.
For a long time this was all vibes and Instagram. Then researchers finally looked at it directly.
In the first empirical study of gentle parenting, published in PLOS ONE in 2024, psychologists Anne Pezalla and Alice Davidson surveyed 100 parents of young children and found that about half identified as gentle parents, an approach defined less by any discipline technique than by the parent’s own emotional control. “Those who identified as gentle really prioritized emotion regulation,” Pezalla told CNN.
The same study caught the cost. Gentle parents reported strong satisfaction overall, but a self-critical subset reported significantly lower confidence in their own parenting, with one describing being “overwhelmed all day every day.” The researchers flagged open questions about whether the approach is sustainable for the parents running it.
That’s the millennial definition in one finding. The bar isn’t behavior, it’s the parent’s internal state, which means the job never clocks out. You can fail at it silently, in your own head, while doing everything right on the outside.
It also explains what they’re afraid of. In Pew’s survey, anxiety and depression topped the list of parental worries, with 40 percent of parents extremely or very worried, ahead of bullying, kidnapping, drugs, and getting shot. For the generations before them, a good parent protected the body. Millennials assigned themselves the mind.
Gen Z parents are keeping the feelings and bringing back consequences
The oldest Gen Zers are pushing 30, plenty of them have kids, and the early returns are not what anyone predicted. The generation raised on validation is reintroducing the real world.
In a 2025 Talker Research survey of 2,000 parents of young children, 54 percent of Gen Z parents said their priority is preparing their child for the real world, while 62 percent of millennial parents said theirs is supporting their child emotionally. Same question, opposite answers, one generation apart.
The gentle parenting numbers are more striking.
Gen Z was the first generation partially raised under it, and only 32 percent of them use it with their own kids. More of them, 41 percent, describe what they do as cycle-breaking, which is aimed at family patterns rather than at any single tantrum, and most say gentleness works in some situations rather than all of them.
So the Gen Z definition of a good parent looks like a merger. Keep the emotional fluency, they’re not giving that back. But attach it to consequences, disappointment, and the news that the world will not validate you. Less trophy, more truth, delivered kindly.
There’s an obvious asterisk here, and it’s the same one that applies to every generation’s early confidence. Gen Z’s kids are still in diapers and preschool. Nobody’s definition of good parenting survives a fifteen-year-old intact, and the real test of their approach is a decade out.
Which might be the only real conclusion available. Each generation built its definition out of whatever its own childhood was missing. The boomers’ parents survived scarcity, so boomers provided. Gen X was left alone, so it showed up. Millennials felt unheard, so they listened. Gen Z watched its parents narrate every feeling and decided kids also need to be told no.
Four definitions, each one an apology to the child its author used to be. The next one is already forming in a crib somewhere, taking notes.
