A therapist told me once that I had excellent emotional control, and she didn’t mean it as a compliment. What she was describing was my ability to make a feeling invisible—to go flat and composed in situations that warranted neither. She said I’d gotten very good at it, and I had, but it wasn’t the same as actually handling anything, which I’d spent years not understanding.
What I’d been calling control was just suppression. The feeling arrived, I put it somewhere out of sight, and kept moving. The feeling stayed there intact, unchanged, waiting. That’s not regulation—that’s storage, and the problem with storage is that it fills up. Most of what people mean when they say they’re good at handling their emotions is the same thing. They’ve just learned to be tidy about it.
You think control means turning the feeling down
The image most people have of emotional control is a dimmer switch. Something arrives—anger, anxiety, the particular dread that shows up before a hard conversation—and the goal is to turn down the volume. Not feel it as intensely. Get it below the threshold where it affects you. This is the operating model, and it’s almost universally held, and it’s wrong in a way that matters.
Feelings don’t work like noise you can quiet. They’re more like weather that’s already happening. The question isn’t whether you can make it stop—you can’t—it’s what you do while it’s there. And the thing most people do while it’s there is try to make it stop, which is exactly the strategy that keeps them stuck.
The people who are actually good at this—who can sit in a hard emotion without being run by it—aren’t suppressing anything. They’ve just learned to put their attention somewhere other than the feeling itself while the feeling does whatever it’s going to do. That’s a very different skill from the one most people have been working on.
The feeling isn’t the problem—what you do with it is
When anger shows up, and you say something you regret, the anger isn’t actually what caused the problem. What caused the problem is what you did while the anger was there. This distinction sounds obvious and changes everything once you actually take it seriously.
Most people treat the feeling as the enemy. If I hadn’t felt so angry, I wouldn’t have said that. If I hadn’t been so anxious, I could have handled it better. The feeling gets assigned responsibility for the behavior, which means the strategy becomes managing the feeling—reducing it, suppressing it, pushing it down. But the feeling and the behavior aren’t the same thing. You can be angry and say nothing. You can be anxious and do the hard thing anyway.
What you do while the feeling is present is almost entirely separate from the feeling itself. That gap—between what you feel and what you do—is where the actual control lives. Most people aren’t operating in that gap at all. They’re either expressing the feeling directly or trying to eliminate it, with very little in between. This is also why the advice to calm down before addressing something is often counterproductive. It puts the emphasis on the feeling when the feeling isn’t the issue. You can make choices about what you do without the feeling of needing to change first.
More Bolde Stories
Suppression doesn’t make it smaller; it just makes it louder
There’s a lot of research on this, and it consistently shows the same thing: pushing an emotion down doesn’t reduce it. It postpones it, sometimes amplifies it, and costs you something in the process.
James Gross, whose research on emotion regulation and its consequences has been published in Psychophysiology, found that suppression—inhibiting the outward signs of inner feelings—failed to reduce the actual emotional experience. The feeling remained at full intensity while the expression was being controlled. And the physiological cost of maintaining that control was measurable: people who suppressed showed elevated stress responses compared to those who used other strategies.
The specific way this backfires isn’t always dramatic. Sometimes the emotion arrives later, in a different context, with less capacity to deal with it. Sometimes it’s a general deadening—you suppress the hard thing, but you also end up suppressing some of the good things, because you’ve trained the whole response system not to let much through. And sometimes it’s just exhaustion, the particular kind that comes from spending significant energy holding something at bay that was never actually going to hurt you if you’d let it arrive.
You have more of a choice than you think
Not over what arrives—feelings show up when they show up, and their content is largely not a choice. But what happens after they arrive is more up to you than most people realize.
Allison Troy and colleagues, whose work on emotion regulation and psychological health has been published in Psychological Science, found that the approach people take to a difficult emotion—not just whether they’re capable of regulating but how they engage with it—significantly changes the outcome. The same emotion, handled differently, produces very different results. What mattered wasn’t the feeling. It was the approach.
The part you have more control over than you think is where you put your attention while the feeling is there. You can focus on the feeling itself—its intensity, its presence, how long it’s lasting—or you can focus on something else while it runs its course. This sounds like a small thing, and it isn’t. Most people, when they feel something difficult, put all their attention directly on it. They think about why they feel it, how long it’s been there, and whether it’s appropriate to feel this much. That attention makes the feeling larger, not smaller—you’re essentially watering it. The redirect is the skill.
You’ve been practicing the wrong thing for a long time
Suppression is a learned behavior. Nobody starts out suppressing feelings—small children are not known for their emotional restraint. What happens over time is a training process: certain feelings produce negative responses from the environment, and you learn to hide them. That gets reinforced, and the hiding gets more practiced, and at some point, it stops feeling like hiding and starts feeling like composure. It’s the same thing.
The practice is real. If you’re good at suppression, you’ve gotten genuinely better at it over the years of doing it. The problem is that you’ve built a muscle for the wrong exercise. All the effort that went into managing the expression of emotions was effort not going into learning what to do with them instead—how to notice them without following them, how to put attention somewhere more useful while they run their course.
The work of unlearning this isn’t intense. It’s more like noticing, repeatedly, when the impulse to suppress kicks in, and choosing not to follow it. Not performing the feeling, not analyzing it, not trying to make it different—just letting it be there while you put your focus somewhere else. That builds the same way the other thing built—through repetition, through small repeated choices to do the different thing. The muscle you end up with is more useful.
More Bolde Stories
Getting better at this doesn’t mean your feelings get quieter
This is what a lot of people get wrong about emotional regulation. They think the goal is to feel less—to become more stoic, more contained, less affected by things. And when they picture someone who is good at this, they picture someone for whom things don’t seem to land as hard.
That’s not what it looks like. The people who’ve actually gotten good at being with difficult emotions tend to feel things just as intensely. What changes is the relationship to the feeling, not its volume, but what happens when it arrives. It doesn’t immediately run the room. It’s there, they know it’s there, and they keep functioning while it does whatever it’s going to do.
The feelings don’t get quieter. The alarm response to the feelings gets smaller. And that distinction matters, because if you’re trying to feel less, you’ll keep working at the wrong thing. The point isn’t to become less sensitive or more numb. It’s to stop treating every feeling as something that requires a response before you can get on with things. Most of them will pass on their own if you let them, without requiring anything from you at all.
More Bolde Stories
People who reach their 70s with almost no one left to call usually made the same 9 quiet choices ...
The clearest signs of a sharp mind are usually the quiet ones — changing your view out loud, sayi...
