Procrastination gets called a lot of things.
Lazy. Unmotivated. Unfocused. It’s the word people use when they want to explain why someone isn’t living up to their potential, and it always sounds like a diagnosis.
But some of the most original people who ever lived procrastinated constantly. They missed deadlines, left things unfinished for years, and drove everyone around them crazy with how long they took.
And the work they produced, when it finally showed up, changed everything.
That’s not a coincidence. The traits that make someone a procrastinator overlap with the traits that make someone an original thinker, and the research is starting to show why.
1. They let ideas sit instead of forcing a finish
Leonardo da Vinci started the Mona Lisa around 1503 and didn’t finish it until roughly 1519. Sixteen years on a single painting, with long stretches in between where he wasn’t touching it at all.
He was studying optics, sketching anatomy, designing machines, writing backward in notebooks that filled over 6,000 pages.
From the outside, it looked like he couldn’t focus. From the inside, the detours were feeding the painting.
Historians now believe that da Vinci’s understanding of light, shadow, and the human face deepened so much during those years that the Mona Lisa couldn’t have existed without the delays.
Organizational psychologist Adam Grant studied this pattern and found it wasn’t unique to da Vinci. His student Jihae Shin ran a study where one group of people started working on a creative task immediately, and another group delayed starting the task.
The procrastinators’ ideas were rated 28% more creative by independent evaluators. The delay gave the problem time to stay active in the background, where connections could form that the conscious mind wouldn’t have made on its own.
2. They keep revising until the last possible moment
Martin Luther King Jr. was still rewriting the “I Have a Dream” speech at ten o’clock the night before he delivered it.
The next morning, standing at the Lincoln Memorial, he set the script aside partway through and improvised the section that became the most famous words of the twentieth century.
Abraham Lincoln did something similar with the Gettysburg Address. He didn’t finalize the closing paragraph until the night before, and he was still making changes the morning of the speech. In 272 words, he reframed the entire Civil War.
Both of them could have finished earlier. The reason they didn’t is the same reason a lot of procrastinators don’t: the version they had wasn’t the version they wanted, and they kept the door open until something better walked through it.
Grant calls this strategic delay. The most memorable speeches and pitches in history share this quality. They were written at the edge of the deadline, when the pressure forced a kind of clarity that earlier drafts couldn’t reach.
More Bolde Stories
3. They jump between projects instead of finishing one at a time
Da Vinci is the clearest example of this, but he’s far from the only one.
Frank Lloyd Wright reportedly spent months thinking about the design for Fallingwater, one of the most famous houses ever built, without putting anything on paper.
When the client called to say he was driving over to see the plans, Wright sat down and sketched the entire blueprint in the hours before he arrived.
This is how a lot of procrastinators operate. They don’t sit still. They rotate between things, and the jumping that looks scattered from the outside is doing something useful underneath.
Ideas from one project bleed into another. A solution that doesn’t fit where it was found ends up fitting somewhere else.
The person who works on five things at once and finishes them all late often produces work that a linear thinker couldn’t have reached, because the cross-pollination only happens when multiple problems are open at the same time.
4. They rely on the pressure to perform well
Douglas Adams, who wrote The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, was so famous for missing deadlines that his most quoted line is about the deadlines themselves, not his books.
Victor Hugo had a different approach. When he needed to finish The Hunchback of Notre-Dame and couldn’t stop leaving the house, he reportedly had his valet lock away all of his clothes. With nothing to wear outside, he stayed at his desk and wrote.
Neither of these stories is about discipline failing.
They’re about people who understood that their best work showed up under a specific condition, and that condition was pressure.
Without the constraint, the possibilities stayed open, and nothing got committed. With it, the options narrowed to the point where the only move left was to produce.
Grant’s research backs this up. The creative advantage of procrastination only appeared when the person was already engaged with the problem.
They had started thinking about it, they had the raw material in their heads, and the delay gave the material time to rearrange. The deadline was what forced the final shape.
5. They intentionally sit in the discomfort of not knowing
Most people rush to resolve uncertainty. Pick a direction, commit to a plan, close the open question. The discomfort of I don’t know yet is hard to sit with, and the fastest way to make it stop is to choose something and move.
Albert Einstein spent over a decade developing general relativity. He sat with incomplete ideas, followed paths that turned out to be wrong, and kept going back to the drawing board rather than publishing a version he knew was missing something.
The theory he eventually produced reshaped physics, and it couldn’t have existed without the years of not knowing.
Psychologists call this the incubation effect: the finding that stepping away from a problem, or sitting with it unresolved, allows unconscious processing that conscious effort can’t replicate.
What gets called avoidance is often a refusal to commit to an answer before it feels right. They’re not frozen. They’re waiting, and the waiting has a purpose, even when it doesn’t look like one from the outside.
The difference between someone who’s stuck and someone who’s incubating isn’t always visible. But the person who can sit with the open question longer than everyone else in the room is often the one who walks out with the answer nobody expected.
More Bolde Stories
Opinion | Nobody gets to put an expiration date on your grief — the tidy timeline everyone seems ...
7 things a daily journaling habit reveals about how someone processes life — and why researchers ...
If compliments make you physically uncomfortable, you probably heard these 7 sentences on repeat ...
What this doesn’t excuse
This isn’t to say that all procrastination is creative genius in disguise. Grant’s research was clear about this: the creativity boost came from moderate procrastination, not chronic avoidance.
The person who never starts at all doesn’t get the benefit, because the problem was never active in the first place. There’s nothing incubating if nothing was planted.
But for the person who starts thinking about the problem and then takes a long time to finish it, the delay isn’t a character flaw. It’s a process.
And it’s the same process that produced the Mona Lisa, the Gettysburg Address, and a house built over a waterfall by a man who hadn’t drawn a single line until the client was already on his way.
