The most embarrassing thing about me is something I didn’t say out loud for about fifteen years. I’m afraid of the dark. In the way I was at eight, in a way that never fully went away. I sleep with something on. I don’t walk through an unlit house without turning lights on as I go. I am a functioning adult who is afraid of the dark, and for a long time, I treated this as something that would be genuinely damaging if anyone found out.
By the time I finally said it—to one person, in a low-stakes moment—the response was so underwhelming that I sat with that for days afterward. She laughed, not unkindly, and said she still checked under the bed sometimes. That was it. All that silence. For that.
Shame works exactly this way. It needs you to stay quiet to stay powerful. The moment you don’t, it starts losing its grip—not because the thing goes away, but because the silence was the whole mechanism. What you say out loud stops being something shame owns. It becomes just a thing that’s true about you—smaller, more ordinary, and considerably less dangerous than the version that had been living in the quiet.
The longer you keep it, the bigger it gets
This is the mechanism shame runs on. In the silence, the thing you’re hiding has no reality check—it just sits there, growing in whatever direction your worst fears point. You add to it every time you avoid a conversation that might have revealed it. You add to it every time you steer around a topic because the topic gets too close. The version of the flaw that exists inside the silence is almost always larger, more damning, more permanent-feeling than the actual thing would be if it were just said out loud and examined in ordinary light.
What silence does, specifically, is remove the possibility of a proportionate response. You can’t find out that something is manageable while you’re still hiding it—you can only imagine how unmanageable it would be if anyone knew. And imagination, when it’s being run by shame, is not neutral. It catastrophizes. It finds the worst-case version and treats it as the likely one. The only thing that interrupts that process is saying the thing, which lets the reality of other people’s actual responses replace the imagined ones. Reality is almost always kinder than what shame had told you to expect. It’s very hard to know that from inside the silence.
It feels like a confession, but it creates connection
The assumption underneath the silence is that saying the thing will create distance. That people will think less of you, pull back slightly, recalibrate their opinion in a direction you can’t control. That’s what shame tells you will happen, and it’s persuasive enough that most people never test it. They keep the thing and operate on the assumption that the telling would cost them something they can’t afford to lose.
What actually happens, consistently and almost without exception, is the opposite. The admission doesn’t push people away—it pulls them closer. Not because people enjoy learning that you’re imperfect, but because the imperfection is recognizable. It maps onto something in their own experience, something they’ve also been keeping, and the moment you name yours, you give them permission to acknowledge theirs. The conversation that results from that is a different quality of conversation than the ones that happen between two people who are both performing wholeness. Something becomes available that wasn’t before—a kind of ease, a kind of realness, a sense of being seen rather than evaluated.
More Bolde Stories
I once believed that because my parents loved me, they must have gotten most things right — but a...
You can usually tell someone has made real peace with aging by 10 things that no longer bother them
Psychology says people who never expect much from others often aren’t pessimistic—they’re just op...
You’re never as alone in it as you think
The specific cruelty of shame is that it makes the thing feel singular—like this particular failure or fear or quality belongs only to you, like everyone else is navigating their life without this particular burden, like you are the exception to some rule of normalcy that everyone else is living by. That feeling is almost always false, and it’s also one of the main things that keeps the secret intact. Why say something that makes you uniquely deficient? Why volunteer information that sets you apart in the worst way?
Brené Brown, whose research on shame and vulnerability has been published in Families in Society, found that shame thrives specifically on the belief that we are uniquely alone in our experience—and that the most reliable way to dissolve it is discovering that someone else has been there too. Speaking the thing out loud is what makes that discovery possible. The aloneness was always the illusion. The silence was what kept it intact.
People trust the ones who don’t pretend
There’s a version of you that you present in most situations—competent, composed, handling things, not visibly struggling with the things you’re actually struggling with. That version is fine. It functions. It gets you through most of what daily life requires. What it doesn’t do is make people feel close to you, because it’s performing rather than showing up, and people can feel the difference between those two things even when they can’t name it.
The person who admits a flaw—who says something honest about where they fall short, who doesn’t perform wholeness they don’t have—creates something in the people around them that the polished version never does. It creates permission. Permission to be less than perfect, to admit something, to stop performing for a moment. The admission doesn’t make them smaller in the room. It makes them more real, which makes them more trustworthy, which makes people want to be around them in a different and deeper way than competence alone ever manages. Honesty about your flaws is one of the most effective social acts available to you. Most people are too busy hiding theirs to try it.
The energy you spend hiding it could go somewhere better
Maintaining the gap between who you are and who you’re presenting takes something. Not always dramatically—it’s usually a low-level ongoing cost rather than an acute one. But it’s there, running in the background of every interaction where the thing might become relevant, every conversation you steer slightly to avoid a particular topic, every version of yourself you perform instead of just being. That energy has to come from somewhere, and it comes from the same place that might otherwise go toward actually engaging with your life rather than protecting it.
There’s also the cognitive load of it—the part of your attention that’s always monitoring whether you’re getting too close, whether you’ve said something that might give it away, whether the story you’re telling is consistent with the previous version of the story. That monitoring is constant and largely invisible and genuinely exhausting in the way that constant invisible things are exhausting. You don’t notice how much it’s costing until you stop—until you say the thing and feel, in the hours and days after, a specific lightness that you hadn’t realized was missing. The hiding wasn’t free. It was just a price you’d been paying for so long you’d stopped noticing it was a price at all.
More Bolde Stories
Putting it down is the thing you’ve been putting off
You know what it is. You’ve known for a while. The thing you’ve been managing around, the conversation you’ve been avoiding, the version of yourself you’ve been carefully not presenting. You know the shape of it, the weight of it, the specific way it shows up in the moments when someone gets close enough that it might become relevant. You’ve been carrying it long enough that it feels like part of you—not something you could put down without losing something essential, not something that separates from the rest of you cleanly.
Joshua Smyth, whose research on disclosure and psychological well-being has been published in JAMA, found that people who disclose difficult personal material—whether in writing or conversation—show measurable improvements in psychological and physical health compared to those who continue to suppress it.
The relief isn’t just emotional. It’s physiological. The body carries the weight of the hiding too, and it responds when the hiding stops. You’ve been waiting for the right moment, the right person, the right version of the thing that will make it easier to say. That version isn’t coming. The right moment is the one where you decide the carrying has cost enough.
