I took up running because people in my life had started suggesting, with increasing frequency, that I find something that had nothing to do with work. A hobby. Something with no output. I liked the idea of it: thirty minutes moving at my own pace, not optimizing for anything. I did this for about four months before an app on my phone started displaying weekly performance summaries. Miles logged. Pace per mile. Comparative output against my own previous week. I hadn’t signed up for this. And I found myself, over the following weeks, thinking about whether the run was going to help my average or hurt it.
What happened to my running is the same thing that happens to people who have never quite learned to leave anything unmeasured. They take up something with no deliverable, no output, no score—and somewhere in the months that follow, it starts being scored. The blank space gets filled. For them, it always does. And that’s not an accident—it’s a symptom of something that started much earlier than any hobby did.
They were useful before they were anything else
Before they were interesting or kind or funny or any of the other things that make a person worth knowing, they were good at something. That was the part that got noticed. That was the part that made the adults in the room brighten up and pay attention. And they learned—not from being told but from watching closely—that this was how love worked. There was a table. It was set for people who had something to offer. They figured out what they had to offer, and they got very good at offering it, fast.
Avi Assor, Guy Roth, and Edward Deci, whose research on the emotional costs of parental conditional regard has been published in the Journal of Personality, found that when children perceive love as contingent on performance, they develop what the researchers call introjected internalization—a sense of internal compulsion that replaces genuine desire. The behaviors get enacted, the achievements arrive. But the satisfaction is brief and unstable. Success doesn’t settle the feeling. It just opens the next question of what needs to happen to maintain it.
This is where the pattern plants itself—not in some dramatic moment of withholding, but in the slow accumulation of which version of them got the most warmth in the room. They learned to lead with usefulness because usefulness worked. They learned that being good at things was the surest route to being wanted. That lesson, absorbed early enough, doesn’t stay in childhood. It follows them into every room they’ve ever worked hard to earn the right to be in.
The bar rises the moment they reach it
They work hard, and they achieve things, and none of it delivers what they were expecting. Not because the achievement isn’t real—it is—but because the relief they imagined doesn’t arrive with it. They cross the finish line, and the bar has already moved. There’s something else now: a project, a number, a next goal they’ve quietly begun chasing while the current one was still in progress. They don’t decide to do this. It just happens, the way the running app just happened.
This isn’t ambition in the way ambition is usually described. Ambition is wanting to get somewhere. What this is, is more like the inability to stop—dressed in the language of drive and dedication, performing so convincingly as motivation that even they don’t always recognize it as fear. The version of themselves that rests at the end of a job well done never quite arrives. Something else always gets there first. Something that needs doing before they can feel like enough.
So they develop a relationship with achievement that looks productive from the outside and feels relentless from the inside. The accomplishments are real. The satisfaction is real, briefly. And then the window closes, and the next thing opens, and they’re back at the start of a cycle they didn’t choose and don’t know how to exit—still running a race with no finish line, because the finish line was never what the race was really about. The point was always just to keep moving.
More Bolde Stories
Doing nothing feels indistinguishable from being nothing
Ask them to rest—actually rest, not just swap one kind of producing for another—and something in them resists in a way that’s hard to articulate. It doesn’t feel like laziness or boredom. It feels like danger. The stillness brings a specific dread: the sense that if they stop moving, something will surface that they’ve been outrunning. They don’t always have words for what that thing is. They just know they don’t want to find out. So they keep moving, because moving feels like proof that they’re still okay.
What looks, from the outside, like a love of work is often something closer to avoidance—the learned avoidance of what happens when there’s nothing to point to, nothing being evaluated, no output accumulating. Doing nothing triggers a quiet but persistent internal question: if they’re not producing anything, what exactly are they? It’s a question they absorbed before they had the perspective to examine it. And they’ve never been able to sit with it long enough to find out whether the answer was actually as frightening as they assumed.
The cruelty in this is that the rest they avoid is often the only thing that would help. Not help them be more productive—help them find out who they are when the productivity isn’t there as scaffolding. But because that discovery feels threatening rather than freeing, they keep choosing to do.
Nobody in their life gets all of them at once
The people closest to them know the specific experience of being in a room with someone who is also somewhere else. They’re present enough—they listen, they respond, they’re there. But there’s always a part of them elsewhere: the unfinished thing from this morning, the email they haven’t sent, the decision that’s been running quietly in the background since before the conversation started. Their attention isn’t deliberately withheld. It isn’t even conscious. It’s just never entirely free.
I’ve been that person in a room. There was a stretch of time when someone I loved pointed out, gently at first and then less gently, that talking to me felt like talking to a mannequin. I didn’t argue because I knew it was true. I’d be present on the surface—nodding, responding—while something in me was already moving to the next thing. I thought I was hiding it well enough. The people who love you always know before you admit it to yourself.
They don’t stop until something stops them
At some point, the body presents its accounting. It isn’t always dramatic—sometimes it’s a slow accumulation of small things that compounds until the total becomes undeniable. The sleep stopped being restful. The low-grade headaches settled in for weeks. The weekend that was supposed to recharge them and didn’t, and then the next one didn’t either. They attributed each symptom to something specific—a difficult stretch, a bad week, not enough water—and kept going. The body kept noting it anyway.
Christine Chamberlin and Naijian Zhang, whose research on the relationship between workaholism and health has been published in the Journal of Counseling & Development, found that people who scored higher on measures of workaholism reported lower self-acceptance, worse psychological well-being, and more physical health complaints—and that the same pattern held for those who grew up with workaholic parents. The cycle, in other words, was being handed down. And the body keeps a more honest record than the to-do list does.
What finally stops them is different for each person. Sometimes it’s a diagnosis. Sometimes it’s a relationship that ends, or nearly does. Sometimes it’s a body that simply refuses one morning—that doesn’t respond to willpower the way it once did. Whatever form the stop takes, it tends to arrive as a shock. Not because they didn’t know they were running hard. But because they’d believed, somewhere, that they were the exception. That they’d worked hard enough to be.
More Bolde Stories
The work was never really about the work
It was about the question the work was holding in place: whether they were worth anything when they weren’t producing something. That question was planted early, before they had the language for it. They’ve been answering it ever since—with output, with achievement, with a relentlessness that reads as ambition and runs on something much older than that. The work was the answer they gave before they knew a different one existed. At some point, they get to find out whether a different answer was always there. For most of them, it was.
