The parents who feel most abandoned later are often the ones who taught their kids not to need anyone

The parents who feel most abandoned later are often the ones who taught their kids not to need anyone

I have a memory of calling my mother from college during a week when everything had just gone to absolute crap.

My relationship was ending.

My grades were slipping.

I was eating cereal for the third night in a row and couldn’t quite name what I was feeling, but knew it was a lot.

She picked up on the second ring, asked how I was doing, and before I could answer, she said, “I’m sure you’ll figure it out. You always do.”

She meant it as a compliment.

I didn’t say much after that. Just agreed that I probably would, said I had to go, and hung up.

Then I sat in my dorm room and did exactly what she’d predicted: I figured it out alone.

I’ve thought about that a lot. Not with resentment—she was doing what she’d always done, which was trust me to handle things.

I was capable, self-sufficient, and rarely asked for anything. She was proud of all of that.

What she didn’t know, and I didn’t know how to say, was that I’d learned not to ask because I’d grown up understanding that asking wasn’t really what we did. From a thousand small moments—the deflections, the praise for managing alone, the sense that needing something was a little embarrassing for everyone.

Now that we’ve both gotten older, her calls have gotten more frequent. She says she just wanted to check in. But I know she feels far away from me—not just physically, but emotionally.

What’s hard to explain is that the distance she feels now is one she helped build.

Here’s how that happens to parents in this dynamic.

1. They taught their kids that struggling alone was strength

A senior couple using a map to walk around a new city.
Shutterstock

Not out of cruelty. Often out of love—a conviction that self-sufficiency was the greatest gift they could give. They stepped back when their kids struggled and praised the figuring out more than they acknowledged the difficulty of the thing being figured out. What got built, quietly, was a child who learned that struggle was private—that the parent was there for the outcomes, but not for the middle part, where things were hard, and someone might need to be held steady.

What got built, quietly, was a child who learned that struggle was private. That the parent was there for the good news and the outcomes, but not necessarily for the middle part—the part where things were hard and uncertain, and someone might need to be held steady by another person.

By the time that child is an adult, the habit is deep. They don’t call when something’s wrong. And the parent, who meant to teach resilience, sometimes finds themselves wondering why their kid never really lets them in.

2. They praised toughness more than they named feelings

“You didn’t even cry.” “You handled that so well.” “I knew you could do it.” These are the things said at the moments when a child was struggling—framed as compliments, received as instruction. The instruction was clear: the right response to difficulty is composure.

What develops over time is a person who is genuinely skilled at managing hard things but has no real map for sharing what those hard things cost. The parent later wonders why their adult child seems fine and distant at the same time. It’s because they taught them to be both.

3. They treated emotional needs as something to manage, not meet

When the child was upset, the goal was often to get them back to okay as quickly as possible. Not to sit with the feeling, not to understand it—just to resolve it and move on. Distraction. Solutions. Gentle redirection toward something more manageable.

Research on emotionally immature parenting has found that when parents consistently treat a child’s emotional needs as problems to be solved rather than experiences to be shared, the child gradually stops bringing those needs forward at all. The emotional life goes underground. And underground is where it tends to stay.

4. They missed the small moments, so the big ones got handled alone

The small things are where trust gets built. The minor disappointments processed together. The small fears were talked through. When those moments are consistently missed—because the parent is busy, or distracted, or uncomfortable with the smallness of it—the child learns to process alone.

Researchers who study parent-child bonding have found that emotional availability in ordinary, low-stakes moments is what teaches a child that closeness is safe. A parent present for dramatic moments but absent for ordinary ones ends up raising a child who never learned to let someone in.

5. They confused love with logistics

They showed up for the practical things. Rides to practice. School lunches. Bills paid on time. What was harder was the other part—the sitting with, the asking how it felt, the making space for something that didn’t have a solution.

I remember understanding, as a kid, that I was loved. What was harder to access was the feeling of being known. Those aren’t the same thing. A parent can love a child completely and still not quite see them—and the child grows into an adult carrying a quiet hunger for something they can’t quite name.

6. They were proud when their child stopped asking

There was a moment—probably more than one—when the child stopped bringing things to the parent and the parent felt, quietly, relieved. A child who handles things independently is easier. Less demanding. Less emotionally complicated.

That relief got communicated, even if nothing was said. And the child, who was paying close attention, noticed.

7. They built walls and called them boundaries

Some of what got passed down as values—privacy, self-reliance, not being a burden—was emotional distance dressed in language that made it sound healthy. “We don’t air our problems.” “We’re not a family that wallows.” These aren’t inherently wrong things. But when they become the entire framework for how closeness works, what they produce is a family where everyone is technically fine and no one is particularly close.

The parent built those walls carefully. What they didn’t anticipate was standing on one side of them later, wondering why no one comes through.

8. They never let their own pain be visible

The child never saw the parent ask for the help they actually needed. Never watched them sit with something unresolved, or admit out loud that they didn’t know what to do, or let someone else carry something for a while. The parent moved through difficulty the way they always had—quietly, competently, without making a scene of it. What the child absorbed wasn’t a lesson about strength. It was a lesson about what you do with the hard things: you don’t show them.

What the child absorbed wasn’t a lesson about strength. It was a lesson about what adults do with the hard things: they don’t show them. Vulnerability, seen from that angle, starts to look like a lapse. Something that happens to people who haven’t gotten themselves together yet.

By the time the child is grown, they’ve internalized this so completely that they can’t always identify it as learned behavior. It just feels like who they are. And the parent, who modeled all of it so carefully, sometimes wonders why their child never opens up.

9. They wanted independent children, and they got them

And now those children are adults who are capable and self-sufficient and manage their lives with a competence that would make anyone proud. They just don’t call much. They don’t share the hard stuff. They don’t need much, the way they were taught not to need much.

The parent who wanted that now lives in the quiet of it.

Julie Brown is in her early 60s and fully embracing the freedom that comes with experience. A grandmother of two and an avid gardener, she writes with quiet wisdom, humor, and a belief that growth never really stops. Her favorite topics are based on her lived experience: marriage, parenting, adult kids. When she’s not at her desk, she’s tending to her roses, hosting Sunday dinners, or walking the lake trail with her old golden retriever.